Mining Engineering · Feasibility · Permitting
Median project timeline
14 months
from discovery to bankable feasibility
94%
Feasibility studies financed
31
Active projects globally
$2.4B
Capital unlocked to date
Cross-section / Deposit Model
[LIVE RENDER]
Scale 1:5000 · Vertical exaggeration ×2
SURFACE EL. +245mOVERBURDEN — QUATERNARY ALLUVIUMHOST ROCK — METASEDIMENTARY SEQUENCEFAULTORE LENS — 2.4g/t AuSATELLITEDECLINE-15% GRADEL1 -50mL2 -100mL3 -150mS-01S-02S-03VENT0m100m200m290mOre body / stopesHost rockInfrastructureOverburdenSEAM ©2026
Exploration Targeting
Resource Estimation
Scoping Study
Geotechnical Analysis
Environmental Permitting
Mine Design
Feasibility Study
Construction Management
Commissioning
Production Ramp-Up
Exploration Targeting
Resource Estimation
Scoping Study
Geotechnical Analysis
Environmental Permitting
Mine Design
Feasibility Study
Construction Management
Commissioning
Production Ramp-Up
Phase 01

Exploration & Resource Definition

Engineering Challenge

Geology misread at the drill stage

Structural complexity in folded metasedimentary sequences causes resource models to overstate continuity. When the assay database contains collar errors or down-hole survey gaps, the block model fails at pre-feasibility — costing 18–24 months of rework and triggering re-financing risk.

23%
of junior projects re-drill after PFS due to resource model failure
01
Seam Methodology

Systematic geological modelling with independent audit

Seam deploys implicit geological modelling (Leapfrog Geo) against a validated drillhole database. Every collar is GPS-verified, every down-hole survey is gyroscopically confirmed. The resource estimate is built to JORC 2012 / NI 43-101 standard with an independent QP sign-off built into the workflow, not bolted on at the end.

01Drillhole database validation (>2,400 QA/QC checks)
02Structural domain interpretation
03Variogram modelling per domain
04Kriging + simulation cross-validation
05Independent QP technical review
100%
of Seam resource estimates accepted by TSX and ASX regulators on first submission
Andean Cu-Mo Porphyry — 1.2Mt Cu resource defined in 11 months
Phase 02

Scoping & Pre-Feasibility

Engineering Challenge

Water ingress and geotechnical instability

Underground operations in fractured rock aquifers face dewatering costs that can render a project sub-economic. Without a hydrogeological model tied directly to the mine plan, operators discover the problem at portal breakthrough — not in the study.

$18M
average unplanned dewatering capex when hydrogeology is excluded from scoping
02
Seam Methodology

Integrated hydrogeology and geomechanics from day one

Seam embeds a hydrogeological model (MODFLOW) and a geomechanical domain assessment into the scoping study, not as appendices but as inputs to the mine plan. Dewatering rates, drawdown cones, and piezometric recovery curves inform decline positioning, ventilation design, and ground support specifications simultaneously.

01Packer testing and hydraulic conductivity mapping
02MODFLOW steady-state and transient modelling
03Rock mass classification (Q-system, GSI)
04Empirical and numerical stope stability analysis
05Integrated mine plan iteration
14%
average reduction in underground development capex versus industry benchmark
West African Gold — dewatering capex reduced by $9.4M at PFS stage
Phase 03

Definitive Feasibility Study

Engineering Challenge

Regulatory bottleneck and permitting delay

Environmental impact assessments that are filed without pre-consultation with regulators and communities routinely trigger objection periods of 12–36 months. For a project burning $800K/month in holding costs, this is a project-killer.

34 months
average permitting delay when EIA is filed without pre-consultation framework
03
Seam Methodology

Permitting-as-critical-path from the feasibility stage

Seam treats the permitting pathway as a critical-path item in the project schedule, not an afterthought. We map the regulatory matrix at scoping, engage Indigenous consultation protocols at pre-feasibility, and design the EIA to address anticipated objections before they are raised — embedding offset strategies and community benefit agreements into the DFS.

01Regulatory matrix mapping (federal + state + local)
02Early Indigenous consultation protocol
03Baseline environmental data collection
04EIA structured to anticipated objections
05Community benefit agreement design
8 months
median permitting timeline for Seam-managed projects versus 34-month industry average
Queensland Coal — operating licence issued 26 months ahead of industry median
Phase 04

Detailed Design & Construction

Engineering Challenge

Capital cost overrun at construction mobilisation

Projects that reach construction with Class 3 capital estimates routinely experience 25–40% cost growth. The root cause is almost always scope gaps in the DFS — undefined interfaces between process plant, tailings, and underground infrastructure that surface only when contractors begin detailed engineering.

31%
average capex overrun on mining projects with Class 3 estimates at FID
04
Seam Methodology

Owner's engineer continuity from DFS to commissioning

Seam provides Owner's Engineer continuity — the same technical team that built the DFS manages the EPCM procurement, reviews contractor deliverables, and holds the scope baseline. We maintain a live cost model updated weekly against contractor progress claims, with variance triggers at 3% that activate corrective action before overruns compound.

01Scope baseline locked at FID with contractor interface matrix
02EPCM procurement with back-to-back scope transfer
03Weekly cost model vs. earned value tracking
04Independent commissioning readiness review
05Production ramp-up optimisation
97.4%
of Seam construction-managed projects delivered within 5% of DFS capital estimate
Nevada Silver — 1,200 tpd processing plant commissioned 3 weeks ahead of schedule
Project Outcomes · Live Monitor

Operational System Metrics

All projects on schedule
Underground mine drift with headlamp illumination showing rock face and drill equipment
(001)
Neural Core · Active Projects
31 Active6 Regions

Scalable Feasibility Architecture

[LIVE MONITOR]

Deploying integrated geological and engineering systems for bankable, financier-ready deliverables.

Avg. Feasibility Timeline
14mo
vs. 26mo industry avg
Regulatory Acceptance Rate
100%
First submission, no resubmissions
Capex Accuracy
±4.8%
vs. ±18% industry benchmark
[005]

Designed for Bankable Outcomes

Every study is structured to satisfy TSX, ASX, and Lender technical standards from day one.

$2.4B
Capital Unlocked
(004)

Production Velocity

Turning drill intersections into ore on the belt.
1200tpd
Y1RAMP-UP
(006)
[PROJECTION]

Global Project Footprint

31
Active Projects
6 Regions
Client Validation

Trusted by Operators & Financiers

Middle-aged man in business attire with confident expression, grey-streaked hair
Thomas Bergmann
Managing Director, Cornerstone Capital Partners
Project Finance

"The resource estimate Seam delivered was accepted by the TSX technical reviewer on first submission. No deficiency letters, no resubmissions. In 22 years of project finance, that has never happened to me before."

01
South Asian woman in professional attire with direct gaze, dark hair pulled back
Priya Raghunathan
VP Exploration, Ridgeline Gold Corp.
Exploration

"We brought Seam in at scoping on a structurally complex gold system in Nevada. Their geological interpretation identified a satellite pod our previous consultants had missed entirely — it added 340Koz to the resource."

02
Nigerian-Australian man in open-collar shirt, direct expression, outdoor setting
Marcus Oduya
CEO, Southern Cross Minerals
Permitting

"The permitting timeline Seam achieved in Queensland was 26 months ahead of what our legal team projected. The pre-consultation strategy they designed neutralised the two objections before they were ever filed."

03
French woman in formal business attire, light brown hair, professional setting
Claire Fontaine
Senior Lending Officer, Macquarie Infrastructure Finance
Debt Finance

"We needed a bankable feasibility study that would satisfy Macquarie's technical team. Seam delivered a DFS with a capital cost estimate that came in within 4.2% of the as-built. That's the number that gets the loan signed."

04
Chilean man with short dark hair in technical workwear, mine site background
Reuben Castellanos
Technical Director, Andes Copper SA
Geotechnical

"The integrated hydrogeological model Seam built identified a perched aquifer that would have flooded our portal within six months of breakthrough. Finding it at PFS cost us $180K. Fixing it at construction would have cost $14M."

05
Japanese-Australian man in business casual, relaxed professional expression
Yuki Tanaka
Executive Chairman, Pacific Basin Resources
Schedule

"From first engagement to DFS completion was 14 months. My previous operator took 3.5 years for the same work with a different firm. The schedule discipline Seam runs is unlike anything I've experienced in junior mining."

06
Free Resource · 47 Pages

The Feasibility Playbook

47 pages of the methodology we use on every project — from drillhole validation through to DFS submission. Not a sales document. The actual technical framework.

JORC 2012 / NI 43-101 resource estimation checklist (94-point)
Hydrogeological modelling workflow for underground mines
Permitting pre-consultation framework — 6-jurisdiction matrix
Capex estimate classification guide (Class 1–5 with accuracy ranges)
DFS structure template accepted by 4 major lenders
Mining professional 1 who downloaded the Feasibility Playbook
Mining professional 2 who downloaded the Feasibility Playbook
Mining professional 3 who downloaded the Feasibility Playbook
2,340+ technical directors & project financiers downloaded this month

Get the playbook

We'll send it to your work email immediately. No nurture sequence. No sales calls unless you ask.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time. We respect your data.